blogkeeping13 Oct 2008 09:33 am

Hello all:

We all know that Alexander Campbell did a lot of writing. In his younger years when he first started out writing for the local press, Alexander used pen names to disguise his identity. A good example of this are his “Clarinda Letters” .

Clarkecomments has been my version of the Clarinda letters. As a couple of you know, and as many of you have probably suspected, Clarke is not my name.

I have used a pen name for the last several years for several reasons. If you’ve read my earlier posts, you know that I started this blog being much more conservative than I am now. I worried then about being a staunch conservative and drawing attack. I should probably now worry about being a progressive thinker and drawing attack, but I’ve come to the point where I just don’t care if I am attacked or not.

My journies through church history, theology, biblical cricitism and philosophy have been interesting and worthwhile to me, and they will continue…just not here.

So, without further comment, I invite you to my new blog.

-Clarke

Audio& Video19 Sep 2008 01:17 pm

Comments29 Aug 2008 10:24 pm

“All you have to do is compare what the Gospel asks and what war does. The Gospel asks that we feed the poor, give drink to the thirsty, clothe the naked, welcome the stranger, house the homelss, visit the prisoner, and perform works of mercy. War does the opposite. It makes my neighbor hungry, thirsty, homeless, a prisoner, and sick. It kills them by the millions. The Gospel asks us to take up our cross. War asks us to lay the cross on others.” - Dorothy Day.

Comments28 Jul 2008 12:28 am

Hello Everyone:

I am flying out early Tuesday morning for Nashville to attend the World Convention of Churches of Christ. While I’m there I’m going to visit Lipscomb University, Vanderbilt University, and the Disciples of Christ Historical Society. I am also going to look at housing as my wife and I are interested in moving to Nashville.

If you are going to be there, drop me a note. If I can get access to a computer and have the time, I might do a bit of blogging while there.

-Clarke

Audio& Church of Christ& Comments& theology27 Jun 2008 08:19 am

Warning: My post today is more of a theological rant than it is any type of quasi-pseudo-scholarly examination. If that is what you are looking for today, you will not find it here.

Hello all:

I listen to several radio stations around the Portland area, including a couple of Christian music stations. Two of these Christian radio stations regularly play the James Dobson Family Minute.

Now, I don’t know about the rest of you, but growing up, I thought James Dobson was a member of the Church of Christ because he seemed to be very respected by our fellowship, even my parents. Listening to him now, I can somewhat see why that is… he fits decently into our worldview..close enough to be counted as safe.

I don’t typically care for most of the advice I hear from James Dobson and Focus on the Family. Most of it seems to be psychological and behavoral advice that they try to pass off as biblical or “approved by God,” but really just are human insights that may or may not be correct because of our fallen state.

Most of the time I can handle that, but then I heard this radio clip:

James Dobson Family Minute, 05/23/08 (59 Seconds).

Dobson says that “Any effort to destroy this great nation . . . has to be the ultimate assault on family values.” He goes on to describe how destroying this nation is to subject it to a foreign force that would endanger our freedom. Bill Maer then tells us that it is important to “be grounded in God’s word and to be involved in the Democratic Process . . .whether it is at home or abroad, any issue that threatens the family is one that needs to be faced head on.”

This clip makes several worldy assumptions: that the United States is a great nation, approved by God; that an attack on democracy or freedom is an attack on the family; that Christians have a duty to vote; that Christians have a duty to fight any aggressor that might threaten our nation, democracy, or our freedom.

This flies in the face of Jesus words recorded in Matthew 5:39, “But I tell you, Do not resist an evil person. If someone strikes you on the right cheek, turn to him the other also.”

We equate the United States with Israel. Sometimes it appears that we have embraced Alexander Campbell’s Post-Millenialism… and believe that the Millenium is here, and that we are living in the renewed Earth, with our country as the renewed Israel, our President, no matter who he is, sitting on the throne of David.

Instead, we are living on a fallen Earth, in a Nation that is just as wicked before God as Babylon, believing that we are doing right by fighting anyone who attacks our freedom and our ability to buy whatever we want.

Our forefathers in Churches of Christ wouldn’t have bought into James Dobson’s Worldview, but we appear to have swallowed the line whole.

-Clarke

Church History& Church of Christ& Disciples of Christ& Independent Christian Churches23 Jun 2008 10:15 am

Hello all:

I came across an add on DisciplesWorld.com this morning advertising the Disciples of Christ Historical Society’s Journeys in Faith project. The Society is looking for members of Stone-Campbell churches to go online on their website, and fill out a survey about your memories growing up in your local church. The survey takes about 45 - 60 minutes to complete, and they will take your answers and put them in their oral history collection for current and future Stone-Campbell Historians to use in learning, teaching, and writing.

-Clarke

News& blogkeeping19 May 2008 12:01 am

Hello all:

I am 29 today…and I’m not very thrilled/happy about this…not sure why….

I just have a feeling that its not going to be a great day…prayers accepted and solicited.

I guess I’ll take birthday greetings, too.

-Clarke

Church History& Church of Christ& Restoration& Unity18 May 2008 11:12 pm

Hello all:

Today, Sara and I made it to Doug Foster’s class entitled “Three Decisive Years for Churches of Christ (A Church Historian Reflects on 1809, 1909, and 2009)”. It was such a blessing to hear Doug Foster speak; he is a great teacher and speaker who can really make Church History interesting, even for my wife, who actually wanted to go to his class. This was the second time I’ve heard Doug Foster speak, and both times have been great.

Dr. Foster spent the last part of the class talking about 2009, the year of the Great Communion. To commemorate 200 years since Thomas Campbell’s Decleration and Address, the three streams of the Stone-Campbell Restoration Movement will hold “Great Communion Sunday,” encouraging churches from all three streams to worship, fellowship and commune together. Dr. Foster encouraged people to go out and meet the Disciples and Independents in their areas and to start a plan to celebrate the Great Communion. One of my goals for 2009 will definatly be to help organize a Great Communion event for the Portland area.

Dr. Foster also just released a new book through Leafwood Press focused on the Great Communion called One Church that you can order here.

After Doug Foster’s class, I went and heard Lynn McMillon talk about “Lessons Learned from Restoration History (The Scottish Experience).” Dr. McMillon spoke about the Scottish Glasite and Sandemanian Churches, that called themselves Churches of Christ and which bear quite a resemblance to our movement. This has been a topic I’ve been curious about ever since I read Leroy Garrett’s history of the movement, and it was a very enjoyable class. Dr. McMillon wrote a book on the Glasite churches called Restoration Roots that I’m looking forward to buying and reading.

I ended up missing the next two sessions because of homework, but I ended up with a good great so I guess it was worth it.

Later in the day, I was quite blessed to have dinner withBobby Valentine, and we got to talk about life, school, and theology.

The Main Lecture was by Gary Selby of Pepperdine, who spoke on “The Wealth of the Faithful.” Selby criticized the security and wealth that we cling to, and how that wealth and security interfears with the Christian life, which was odd to hear in Malibu among the million dollar homes, $75k cars in the Pepperdine parking lot, etc. It was a powerful message, though, and helpful to myself and Sara as we continue to strongly consider quitting my secure civil service job to go back to school to study theology.

The night ended in Bobby Valentine’s class on The Struggle for the Soul of Churches of Christ, which was excellent. I must admit, I went to Bobby and John Mark Hicks’ class on Kingdom Come two years ago at Pepperdine, bought the book, read it, and enjoyed it. I was persuaded by many of the arguments in Kingdom Come. And then…I heard Bobby speak about it for three days this year, and had a chance to talk to him about the Nashville Bible School tradition… and that, coupled with the events that have taken place in my spiritual journey over the last two years, has won me over to the apocalyptic worldview embraced by Lipscomb and Harding. I believe it is true to scripture, true to our heritage, and true to the Spirit… I’ve been doing a lot of thinking about these things, and you may see a change in which topics I blog about soon because of it.

Another great night at Pepperdine.

-Clarke

blogkeeping14 May 2008 09:03 pm

Hello everyone:

Since we returned from Pepperdine, I’ve had a few things keeping me from blogging. I got sick and ended up taking a couple of days off work…then when I felt better I cleaned our BBQ grill, anticipating nice weather, and burned both of my eyes with flying debris… that kept me off work and off the computer….and now my whole family has strep..

On the good news-providence side of things though, when i went in for my follow-up appointment for my eyes, they said that they should fully recover, but they think I have Glacoma. So, I have follow-up testing for that. If I do have it, there is treatment available to keep it from progressing…so, it seems that burning my eyes might have been a blessing in disguise.

So, hopefully, baring any further health issues, I should continue my blogs on Pepperdine in the next day or so.

-Clarke

Church History& Church of Christ& Comments& Restoration02 May 2008 10:48 pm

Hello all:

I’m a little behind because I haven’t had easy access to a computer. I’ll try and catch up in the next day or so.

We have been commuting from Calabasis every day to the campus, because we registered two late and all of the rooms were already taken…and since I have both my four year old son and my wife in tow, things haven’t always been smooth or gone according to plan, but they have been fun.

We tried to make it to Richard Cherok’s lecture on Alexander Campbell, but missed it due to traffic. I ended up making it to Robert Hooper’s lecture of David Lipscomb, however. I had the chance to chat with Dr. Hooper for a few minutes before the lecture as we were both waiting outside the classroom while the previous lecture was wrapping up. Dr. Hooper’s lecture was very enjoyable, he talked about Lipscomb and how he is a man for our time today, which I very much agree with. Dr. Hooper announced near the end that his book Crying in the Wilderness: A biography of David Lipscomb, was going to be reissued next year, with a new introduction and some new chapters with current research. I’m excited about that and looking forward to getting a copy when it comes out.

After the lecture, I ended up having to spend a couple of hours working on Art History homework, so we missed the main lecture and several of the afternoon lectures. We made it back in time to hear Randy Harris give what he called an “unSermon” on “The Care and Feeding of Enemies.” The sermon was powerful…he started by reciting the Sermon on the Mount from memory, and then talked about why he couldn’t actually preach the text. Harris’ thesis was that man in incapable of loving his enemy, and that this can only be done with the love God through the Christian in the Holy Spirit. Harris rightfully asserted that without a deeper, biblical theology of the Spirit, we cannot truly understand or live the Sermon on the Mount. I wish my description of the sermon could give justice to what I heard.

After the keynote, I went to Bobby Valentine’s second installment on the Struggle for the Soul of Churches of Christ. Again, the lecture was excellent, and I learned alot more about our more recent history. On a side note, it seemed that throughout the week, I ran into Bobby Valentine every place I went, it appeared impossible not to, which was okay. I promise I wasn’t following you around, Bobby!

-Clarke

Church History& Church of Christ& Comments& Restoration30 Apr 2008 07:23 pm

Hello everyone:

I am at the Pepperdine University Annual Bible Lectures this week.

We arrived a little late for the 1st nights Song Fest, but what we heard sounded wonderful. It is so great to hear a couple of thousand voices singing praises to God at once. The lecture “Turning the World Upside Down” by Donny McLaughlin was excellent. Don spoke on how the church must be a group of revolutionaries for the Kingdom of God. The message was right on, and very timely.

After the main lecture, I went to Bobby Valentine’s lecture “The Struggle for the Soul of Churches of Christ, 1884 - 1984. Bobby spoke about the Nashville Bible School Tradition versus the Texas Tradition, the personalities behind the approaches and the theology that they pushed. It was a great lecture and I am looking forward to hear the next. John Mark Hicks was unable to join Bobby as he is tied up on other affairs; I was sorry to miss him but Bobby did a great job solo.

I hope to have pictures to follow once I get back to Portland.

-Clarke

Comments28 Apr 2008 10:28 pm

Hello All:

My family and I are currently at a hotel near Anaheim, California. I will be blogging live from the Pepperdine University 65th Annual Bible Lectures, for the next few of days. I am really looking forward to the lectures, and hope to meet any of you that might be there.

We went to Disneyland today. My son’s birthday is during the lectureships, so we decided that if we were coming down here, we’d better celebrate his birthday. We were very fortunate in that my son was selected to go up to the bridge of the Disney Ship S.S. Mark Twain - a huge sternwheeler boat- where my son got to “pilot” the ship for the cruise. That was incidental to his birthday, and really topped anything else that we did or saw. What a fun day.

I’ll talk to you tomorrow.

-Clarke

Art& College05 Apr 2008 10:28 pm

Hello All:

I am taking History of Western Art this term, a class I’ve been wanting to take for a long time. I enjoy Christian art and iconography, even though I am no artist myself.

I found this picture in my current reading. I figured I would post it for your edification.

-Clarke

Raising of the Cross - Peter Paul Rubens

Comments17 Mar 2008 10:45 pm

Hello All:

I will be out of town for the next few days for my Anniversary. When I return, I plan to continue my series on the Magisterium of Churches of Christ.

Until then, I will leave you with a small excercise..I’m sure it will generate much lively discussion.

Answer the following question:

Which one of the following is the infallible, inspired word of God?

A. King James (Authorized) Version.

B. New King James Version.

C. Revised Standard Version.

D. American Standard Version.

E. New American Standard Bible.

F. New International Version.

G. Today’s New International Version.

H. The Amplified Bible.

I. The Message.

J. The New Living Translation.

K. The New Revised Standard Version.

L. The Holman Christian Standard Bible.

M. The New Jerusalem Bible.

N. The Ignatius Study Bible.

O. New American Bible.

P. The Douay-Rheims Bible.

Q. English Standard Version.

R. International Standard Version.

S. New Century Version.

T. Revised English Version.

U. Young’s Literal Translation.

V. Contemporary English Version.

W. Confraternity of Christian Doctrine Translation.

X. Knox Translation.

Y. New Millenium Bible.

Z. Twentieth Century New Testament

Discuss.

-Clarke

blogkeeping16 Mar 2008 10:07 pm

Hello all:

So, I’ve had the Restorationmovement.org domain name for a while…. and it has served several different functions, but I’ve not been real thrilled with the site….So, do any of you have any suggestions for a good use for it? I bought it with the intention of creating a yahoo style directory that was everything RM related, but I don’t know….

I’d like to hear your suggestions.

-Clarke

Art& Thoughts15 Mar 2008 01:42 am

Hello Everyone:

In December, my family and I travelled to Springfield, MO, to celebrate my Grandmother’s 90th birthday. While we were there, we also met my three siblings for the first time, and spent a little time exploring St. Louis.

One of the most exciting parts of the trip for me that didn’t involve family was visiting the Cathedral Basilica of St. Louis. This Basillica has the largest collection of mosaic art in the world, and these mosaics are on the walls and ceiling. It is probably the most beautiful building I have ever visited.

Right now I am at work, it is 2:40 in the morning. I am covering another Sergeant position, because my employer just fired someone for misconduct. I get off at 4am, and have to be back on-duty at 8:30am. I’ve been working graveyard for several weeks, and have been working all three shifts in one week. At times like this, I find myself wishing I could be at the Basilica for a couple of hours of quiet prayer, alone. Alas, I cannot.

Below are some photos for your viewing pleasure.

-Clarke

Melchizedek, Abraham and Noah - Mosaic

Jesus - Mosaic

Church of Christ& Dispensationalism& Thoughts& theology01 Mar 2008 09:42 pm

Hello all:

In my last post in this series, I spent a few moments criticizing our hermeneutical lenses of Command, Example and Necessary Inference. In this post, I want to focus on the theological system that we use in examining scripture and salvation history as a whole.

The magisterium, and to some extent, the Restoration Movement in general, holds to a three part, or Tripartite, Dispensationalism. This is ironic because we in Churches of Christ enjoy criticizing “dispensationalists” all the time, especially when it comes to talking about eschatology. I think that this is in part because we do not recognize that we are, in fact, dispensationalists ourselves, though of a different strain than the dispensational pre-millenialists we so often spar with.

Dispensationalism generally serves to separate periods of time into categories, and these categories describe how God dealt with his people during those times. For a full treatment of Dispensationalism in general, you can check out the Wikipedia Article on Dispensationalism.

Tripartite Dispensationalism divides the history of redemption into three parts: The Patriarchal Dispensation, the Jewish Dispensation, and the Christian Dispensation. We see a difference in how God dealt with the patriarchs versus the Nation of Israel, and we see a difference in how God dealt with Israel versus the Church. This is biblical fact. The problem comes when we see no connection between the differences, or dispensations, and declare that nothing God has said or done during the prior dispensations, nor anything that occurred in the prior dispensations, applies to us today.

This idea of disconnected dispensational time periods is most clearly seen in our view of the Old Testament as a whole. The magisterium holds that nothing in the Old Testament applies to us, because the Old Testament describes the Jewish and Patriarchal dispensations. For example, then, according to the Magisterium, the fact that we can read about Instrumental Music being used in the Old Testament to worship God does not mean that we can use it today.

A more obvious problem comes though, when we study the Sermon on the Mount, the Beatitudes, and the teachings of Jesus. Tripartite Dispensationalism claims that the Christian Dispensation started at Pentecost. What does this mean, then? It means that Jesus’ teachings are lumped in with the Old Testament, were only for first century Jews, and that his teachings have no bearing on our conduct and lives as Christians.

It is absurd for us to think that God came down as a man into time, lived life as a human for 33 years, then died on a cross for us, but to also think that God doesn’t want us to take note of how he lived his life on Earth, or what he taught his disciples during that time. Such a claim makes a mockery out of Jesus’ life; a pure, holy, undefiled, perfect life, that he gave up in order to give us eternal life.

Furthermore, such a view of the Old Testament is in sharp contrast with Paul’s words to Timothy in 2 Timothy 3:16-17: All scripture is inspired by God and is useful for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness, so that everyone who belongs to God may be proficient, equipped for every good work. Here, Paul is refering to the Jewish scriptures, not the “Christian” scriptures which haven’t yet been compiled into the Bible at the time of his writings.

Our Tripartite Dispensationalism is more damaging than pre-millenial dispensationalism. The premillenialists don’t deny the Old Testament its significance. We must find a more biblical way of talking and thinking about the History of Salvation. Removing our anti Old Testament bias isn’t enough; we must jettison our Tripartite Dispensationlism and adopt a biblical view. What that view might entail will be the subject of a future post.

-Clarke

============================

Thank you to Bobby Valentine for writing about the Old Testament and our Tripartite Dispensationalism, I was looking for sources and he provided a great one at just the right time.

Church History& Comments& theology25 Feb 2008 12:53 am

Clarke:

I bought a couple of books the other day; they were a present from my wife for Valentine’s day, which is quite amazing as she is always complaining that I have too many books!

The first book is God of Promise: Introducing Covenant Theology, by Michal Horton. The reason for my interest in and purchase of this book will become apparent in my next post that examines the Magisterium of Churches of Christ.

The second book I bought is The Mass of the Early Christians, by Mike Aquilina. Mr. Aquilina is a Catholic Apologist who is regularly heard on EWTN’s Catholic Answers Live. I listen to EWTN radio whenever my favorite Christian radio station plays music that doesn’t deserve to be aired…which in the last couple of months, has been quite alot. Quite a lot of the time Catholic Answers has quite contrived answers to the questions they recieve, but from time to time they do provide some great biblical insight. I bought Aquilina’s book because the Early Church Fathers hint of liturgical worship and hierarchy early in Church History, and while I’ve heard plenty of Catholic Eucharistic theology on the radio, I’m quite interested to read about it. I think it will be a fascinating read, and a good follow up to the book I’m reading right now, John Mark HicksCome to the Table: Revisioning the Lord’s Supper.

-Clarke

Church of Christ& Restoration& Scripture& Thoughts& theology07 Jan 2008 12:21 am

Hello:

In my last post we talked about the existence of a Magisterium in Churches of Christ. In this post we’ll examine one of the main holdings of the Magisterium: The Hermeneutic of Command, Example, and Necessary Inference.

Direct Command, Approved Apostolic Example, and Necessary Inference, or CENI as many call it, has become “our” way of reading the bible. It was taught—and still is in a few—of our colleges for many years. It is the lens through which most of our members read the bible.

This teaching states that we are to look through the New Testament, and pick out the direct commands given to us by God, his son, and his apostles, and follow those commands. Then we are to look through the New Testament, and pick out the examples provided by the apostles, and follow those examples; and finally, again we are to look through the New Testament, and pick out those inferences that are necessary to be followed.

While CENI is the hermeneutical process, there is also a set of assumptions that sit behind CENI. Those assumptions include:

That the New Testament has been handed down as new law to replace the old law.

That the new law is basically a pattern that describes the worship of the church and what a person must do to be saved.

That God expects us to figure out the biblical worship pattern, and to adhere to it.

That lack of adherence to the biblical worship pattern is sinful.

That the sin of not following the biblical worship pattern is not covered by God’s grace and puts eternal salvation in jeopardy.

While I could attack each of these at length, I will at this point just state that there is no biblical evidence that backs up the hermeneutical assumptions of CENI.

As far as the method, it is flawed in many ways. Commands are usually easy to determine.

Examples, though, are far harder. Who approves the examples? What happens when we disagree on which example is approved? A common example that Pentecostal churches follow is the washing of feet. We reject this example out of hand. Is it wrong to wash feet? Is it wrong to not wash feet?

Necessary inferences are even harder. Who says the inference is necessary? Inferences depend totally on human logic. Being a fallen human myself, I don’t know that I want to trust my salvation to how great a job I do at deducting logic problems correctly.

I’m not going to spend a bunch of time attacking CENI. Many others have done so, with great success. Brother (and bishop!)Alan Rouse has a great series on the topic if you wish to read further. What I will say is this: CENI is a snag, sitting silently on the woods, waiting to make a widow out of some unsuspecting churchgoer in our fellowships.

-Clarke

Church of Christ& Scripture& Thoughts& theology20 Dec 2007 12:33 am

Hello all:

Allister McGrath claims that the central idea around the Reformation was that each man is entitled to read and interpret scripture for himself. This idea then explains the myraid of denominations that have formed over the last five hundred or so years since Luther nailed his theses to the door of his local parish.

This idea of each man interpreting scripture for himself was vigerously oppossed by the Roman Catholic Church, which claimed (as still does claim) that only the Magisterium of the Church, entrusted to Supreme Pontiff and his bishops, had the right to interpret Scripture.

Of course, this caused a major problem.

The Church of Christ, whether it will admit it or not, claims to have a magisterium on scripture. Only the church, through its bishops (journals, college presidents, prominent ministers), has the right to interpret scripture. Anyone who comes to a different understanding of scripture than the one advanced by the magisterium is in error, either intentionally or negligently.

This causes a major problem.

This is especially a huge problem when you determine that something in the magisterium is wrong. If one teaching is incorrect, what keeps all the others from being so? My good friend Mark has stated to me several times that everything that our fellowship has stood for has been debunked. While I don’t know that everything has been, I must state that I believe enough of it has that the magisterium has collapsed in the eyes of thosands of members of Churches of Christ, including myself.

And this causes a major problem.

What do you do when everything that you accepted as concrete suddenly vanishes before you?

For some, it means dumping Christianity altogether.

For others, it means joining another denomination; many are fleeing to The Anglican Communion faster than you can blink an eye.

For still others, it means looking around and trying to salvage what you can, and to attempt to find as much truth as you can. This is where I have been, and it is a scary ride. I have searched scripture, tradition, and history… a very “non sola scriptura” mix. Some of my thoughts and musings have been far from Orthodox from a reformed point of view. For now, though, I think I might finally be back in a normal spot. We’ll see.

In my next post we’ll look at the Magisterium in more detail.

-Clarke

Church of Christ& Restoration& Thoughts& blogkeeping& theology19 Dec 2007 01:23 am

Hello all:

I just recently returned from a ten day trip to Missouri. What a trip. I celebrated my Grandmother’s 90th birthday, met an aunt and uncle and a bunch of cousins (from all parts of the family) for the first time, and met all three of my siblings for the first time (I’m adopted).

I also worshipped with a very conservative Church of Christ with my Grandmother, while one of my cousins told me all about how the church down the road where my Aunt and Uncle attend just isn’t “quite right” because they have a praise team. What fun.

Through it all, God showed me every day, several times a day, how I have it good and how my life could be much worse. Praise God for his grace!

On another note, it has been bothering me for quite some time how I am not blogging very often anymore. I am working on developing a series or two to attempt to fix that problem.

There are two main reasons I am not blogging as much: I have things to write about, but I don’t write them down fast enough and then I forgget them, and some of the subjects I want to write about aren’t related to the Restoration Movement.

There are many topics that I want to explore with writing that really don’t have anything to do with our movement. Many of them are spurred on by my orientation as a restorationist, but otherwise, there is little to no connect. In many ways, I’m not sure that I want to blog about those topics here because I have dedicated this blog to examining Churches of Christ and the Restoration Movement at large, but also because I am not sure that all of my audience, both real and potential, would appreciate these other topics nearly as much as they do this one.

So… I am contemplating erecting a second blog….or maybe even keeping this blog up in archive form, but no longer posting to it and instead turning to a second blog to persue my other writing interests. I’d love to hear your opinion on what I should do.

-Clarke

Church of Christ& Independent Christian Churches& Restoration& Unity14 Nov 2007 09:06 pm

Hello all:

I was happy to recieve my weekly email from The Christian Standard this morning. This week’s edition is on Two Views of the Millenium.

Alex Wilson, the minister at the Portland Avenue Church of Christ in Louisville, Kentucky, wrote about his belief in Historic Pre-millenialism.

Robert Lowrey, dean and professor at Lincoln Christian Seminary, wrote about Amillenailism.

The articles were refreshing for several reasons. Wilson is not only Pre-millenial, he’s a member of an acapella Church of Christ. He states his beliefs strongly, but doesn’t attack Amillenialism, or for that matter, musical instruments. He in fact goes out of his way to condemn sectarianism based on any peripherial belief, and points out some arguments that others have made against pre-millenialism that are flawed (such as the statement that pre-mill’s believe that the Church was created as a afterthought).

Lowrey is an Amillenialist, and a member of the Indepedent Christian Churches. He too states his beliefs strongly, but doesn’t attack the other side. He makes his case, and that is that.

Churches of Christ need to learn how to do this; how to examine all-sides of the argument, realize that no one has a monopoly on the truth, and be willing to allow others to have differences in opinion without casting their salvation into doubt. This week, the Christian Standard provides us with a great example on how to do that. I pray that we learn from them.

-Clarke

Church of Christ& Restoration& Thoughts12 Nov 2007 12:31 am

Hello all:

Recently, I’ve been thinking about our use of words in Churches of Christ, and I’m bugged a little by it.

We’ve developed our own language over the years that serves the purpose of seperating us from “the denominations.” (one of our catch-phrases).

A good example of this is that we use the term “auditorium” to refer to large room in which we worship, while most other churches refer to that room as the “sanctuary”. Its like an unwritten rule that we cannot call the auditorum a sanctuary. If you are in one of our church buildings and call the auditorium “the sanctuary,” everyone around you will know right away that you aren’t one of us. Of course, the irony is that neither word is found in scripture.

Another example, is our not using the term “Pastor.” This is now a favorite of mine. I was taught that we can’t call the minister a pastor because this term is reserved for elders. Because we strive to “call bible things by bible names,” an old adage of Alexander Campbell, we reject any church that calls their minister a pastor unless that minister is also an elder.

The problem here is that word usage changes over time. Don’t get me wrong, I’m all for “calling bible things by bible names,” however, we must recognize that all language changes over time. Our use and study of Greek is a prime example of this: We defend that baptism means immersion because the greek baptizo’s original meaning was immersion. However, over time, we can show that the meaning of the word changed to include pouring and sprinkling.

However, when we look at the question of instrumental music, we talk about the word psallo. Psallo originally meant to sing with instrumental accompanyment, or to pluck a stringed instrument. We argue that the meaning of the word changed, and by the time the New Testament was written, Psallo meant to sing only, without accompayment.

So, can we accept that the meaning of the English word “Pastor” has changed over the last 500 years? Personally, I can, especially after reflecting on the fact that the word Pastor is a Latin Word, not a translated or transliterated Greek word.

While the rest of the Christian world calls someone a “Pastor,” we call that same person a preacher, an evangelist, or a minister. Many Churches of Christ, especially the more conservative congregations, seem bent on using the title “evangelist.” While the term is biblical, it rarely if ever describes what the person does. I’ve met very few paid evagelists in Churches of Christ…. they all seem to keep their evangelistic efforts confined to the building. Preacher is probably the most descriptive word for many of these people… but I digress. My conclusion here is that the words minister and pastor are equivilant.

However, now I have one more problem. I’ve identified what I believe, however, I’ve been indoctrinated in our beliefs for so long that I have a hard time changing. I still occasionally cringe when I see an Independent Christian Church title their minister as “Pastor.” I still feel odd hearing the “auditorium” called a “sanctuary.” Old habits die hard, I suppose.

-Clarke

Comments13 Oct 2007 12:04 pm

Hello all:

Its been a while since I posted. I have a few things to write on, but I’ve held back. Until now.

Last night, I recieved my weekly Disciples News Service email. I found the following story at the bottom of the synopsis:

NORTHWEST REGION WELCOMES NEW CHURCH START IN SEATTLE, WA.

Friends of the One has been welcomed as a Disciples congregation in formation by the Regional Board of the Northwest Regional Christian Church (Disciples of Christ). Friends of the One, which met for the first time on Sept. 30, is a Christian Sufi community bringing together the mystical traditions of two faith groups into the formation of a Christian community. The community’s Sufi practices include a silent mediation of the heart. This Sufi tradition is explicit that one can belong to any religion and be a Sufi and there are many Sufis who are actively and fully Christian.

The community also will draw from the non-hierarchical non-creedal Christian Church (Disciples of Christ) tradition, which practices the return to the earliest roots of inclusive Christianity, including weekly communion, to which all are welcome. To learn more about Friends of One, see: www.disciples.org/dns/Releases2007/07157.html

I’ve heard of Sufism, but never known anything about it. According to the Wikipedia Article on Sufism, it is a branch of Islam. Some Sufi’s are considered “universalists” who feel that Sufism is compatible with all relgions and that the Sufi “faith” is the most base form of religion that leads to knowledge about God. Islamic Sufi’s deny universalism as unorthodox.

My first thought about this article is that this is quite disturbing, especially with the words “inter-faith” being used to describe this church. This type of activity seems to affirm what more Conservative Disciples have been saying about the direction the Denomination is heading. I’d like to hear your opinions on the issue.

Also, if you know any Disciples, send them over. Disciples are usually few and far between on here…I’d like to hear what they have to say about this.

-Clarke

Church of Christ& Thoughts& theology12 Aug 2007 01:59 pm

Hello all:

For what its worth, I preached this short sermon this morning at my church:

For the last few months, one of the goals of the worship ministry here has been to make this church, specifically the Sunday morning worship service, more welcoming to those who come in for the first time. It has been our goal to make this church a place where people can come in for the first time and identify with us, and have a desire to return. I think that we have had some success, but much more can and should be done to welcome those who come to worship with us.

A sign on the front of the building of the Portland Avenue Church of Christ in Lexington, Kentucky reads “All are welcome here, especially the stranger and the poor.” This morning I want us to contemplate this statement, to come to an understanding of why the Portland Avenue church has this sign on the front of their building, and why our message should be similar to theirs.

But first, let us pray. Father in heaven, we come before you know as a broken people. We acknowledge and confess our sinfulness, and we ask you to forgive us. We thank you for the grace that you provide through Your son Jesus, and we are thankful that you love us enough to provide a covering for our sins. Lord, we ask that you help us to place all of our trust in you, both when we can see the path and when we cannot. Lord, I ask that you speak through me this morning, that you use me to convey your truth to the church, and that you cover my inadequacy through your perfectness. Lord, finally, I ask you to bless this congregation, and that in doing so that you instill in the church a desire to use those blessings to bless others who need your love. In Christ’s holy name, Amen.

Jeremiah 22:13-16 says: “Woe to him who builds his house by unrighteousness, and his upper rooms by injustice, who makes his neighbor serve him for nothing and does not give him his wages,
who says, ‘I will build myself a great house with spacious upper rooms,’
who cuts out windows for it, paneling it with cedar and painting it with vermilion.
Do you think you are a king because you compete in cedar? Did not your father
eat and drink and do justice and righteousness? Then it was well with him.
He judged the cause of the poor and needy; then it was well.
Is not this to know me? declares the LORD.

The bible is full of scriptures that echo this sentiment. Amos 2:6-8: “Thus says the LORD:
“For three transgressions of Israel, and for four, I will not revoke the punishment,
because they sell the righteous for silver, and the needy for a pair of sandals—
those who trample the head of the poor into the dust of the earth and turn aside the way
of the afflicted; a man and his father go in to the same girl, so that my holy name is profaned;
they lay themselves down beside every altar on garments taken in pledge, and in the house
of their God they drink the wine of those who have been fined.

Proverbs 31:9: “Open your mouth, judge righteously, defend the rights of the poor and needy.”
Isaiah 1:17: “Learn to do good; seek justice, correct oppression; bring justice to the fatherless, plead the widow’s cause.”
These verses, taken together and with plenty of others scattered throughout the bible, suggest a theme… and I submit to you that this theme is one that we have largely forgotten, both here and across the Churches of Christ. Instead, we have embraced our culture, a culture that tells us that we need to have money to have self-worth; a culture that values a lucrative occupation over family; a culture that teaches that the poor and the homeless deserve their lot in life… we have embraced a church-culture that values having a large building and ministries that generate cold hard cash instead instead of one that values serving the poor, the down-trodden, the oppressed, the widow and the fatherless.

I think James, the brother of Jesus, sums it up best with his words in James 1:27 : “Religion that God our Father accepts as pure and faultless is this: to look after orphans and widows in their distress and to keep oneself from being polluted by the world.” He goes on in the next chapter saying: “My brothers, as believers in our glorious Lord Jesus Christ, don’t show favoritism. Suppose a man comes into your meeting wearing a gold ring and fine clothes, and a poor man in shabby clothes also comes in. If you show special attention to the man wearing fine clothes and say, “Here’s a good seat for you,” but say to the poor man, “You stand there” or “Sit on the floor by my feet,” have you not discriminated among yourselves and become judges with evil thoughts? Listen, my dear brothers: Has not God chosen those who are poor in the eyes of the world to be rich in faith and to inherit the kingdom he promised those who love him? But you have insulted the poor. Is it not the rich who are exploiting you? Are they not the ones who are dragging you into court? Are they not the ones who are slandering the noble name of him to whom you belong?”

These are scathing words to James’ audience. Yet they ring as true today as they did almost two thousand years ago when he wrote his letter to the saints. James is writing to us as much as he was writing to the early Christians of his time. His message, and the message of many different writers in scripture, is that the heart of God is especially concerned with the poor and oppressed, and that, as His people, God expects us to have that same love and concern for the poor and oppressed that he has.

Part of the problem is that we don’t seem to have that same love and concern, or at least, not to the extent that we should. Someone here would probably like to stop me just about now and say, “But what about the collection that we take each month for the orphans in Zimbabwe?” or, “What about the indigenous preachers that we support each month, and all the orphans that they take care of?” While its true that we do these things, I fear that they’ve become just another ritual, just as many other things have become for us. We do send money to orphans in Africa, its true, but, does this church really care? Or do we send the money out of a feeling of obligation? What do we know of the people that we are helping? Not much. Am I suggesting that we stop sending money? No, I’m not. However, I think we should consider doing more than sending money to these orphans.

First, we should make our church welcoming to the poor. We must be attentive to what James said in Chapter 2 about showing favoritism to the rich, or even to the middle class. We must be attentive to James’ words, “Has not God chosen those who are poor in the eyes of the world to be rich in faith and to inherit the kingdom he promised those who love him?” We must recognize that the poor have a special place in God’s heart, and make sure that we show those who enter our doors that the poor and oppressed have a special place in our hearts as well. Portland Avenue tries to show this recognition in many ways, one of them being the sign on their door. While the sign on the door is no doubt helpful, we must do more than just proclaim our love for the poor. We must demonstrate our love from the moment they walk through the door.
Second, we must take our faith out of the building and into the streets. We cannot simply show the poor that we love them on Sunday morning. We must demonstrate our love by doing good. Again, to quote Isaiah 1:17, we must “Learn to do good; seek justice, correct oppression; bring justice to the fatherless, plead the widow’s cause.” We can do this in a lot of different ways, as a church body and as individuals. One way, probably the most popular, is by giving money. We have somewhat of a hard time with that, though. Our contribution last week was only $190, which makes it hard for us to give money to the poor. So, if we want to exercise this option, we must become willing to give more. The people here have the resources, but they must commit them to God’s work. However, money isn’t the only answer, nor should it be. One of the reasons that giving money is the most popular option is because it also is the most impersonal and takes the least amount of effort. We cannot allow ourselves to give money alone, because money doesn’t bring people into the Kingdom of God.

We must be willing to seek justice, correct oppression, and bring justice personally. Last week Chris spoke on connectedness, or lack thereof. One thing that we must understand is that God created us as social beings. We are meant to be connected with other people. In this world lacking that connection, we can be most effective in helping the poor and the oppressed by doing so personally. People in this world, especially lost people who do not know Jesus, are longing to be connected. We can serve them by being connected to them, and helping them with their struggles. We can personally bring the homeless blankets, and spend time talking with them about their lives and the love that our Father has for them. We can personally provide food to those who are hungry and share the Good News of Jesus Christ crucified for their sins. We can personally help build a house with Habitat for Humanity and show the love of our God to those who need it most. You can volunteer to be a Court Appointed Special Advocate for abused children. You can spend time at a shelter for abused women and share your talents and love. You can stand up and do good when everyone else walks by and lets evil flourish around them. You can be the personal connection to Jesus that someone desperately needs in their life. That personal connection will do much more good to help the poor and the oppressed than any amount of money could.

So, to bring this all back around. This congregation has a need to strive to be more welcoming to those in our community. We cannot cater to the rich or the middle-class. We should certainly try to be welcoming to these people, but we must make a strong effort to welcome and reach-out to the poor, the oppressed, the widow, the orphan. Its not only what God wants of us, but it is also practical. The people in the neighborhoods around our building are the poor and the oppressed, and need us to be the light that we are called to be. We can be that light by working on being welcoming, and by connecting to those who have no connection. We have a choice. We can embrace the values that our culture espouses, or we can value what God values. We can practice pure and faultless religion, as James describes, or we can practice religion that we’ve developed using our logic and reasoning. Again, the choice is ours. May we choose wisely. Let us pray.

PRAYER

If you have a need of the church this morning, whether it be prayer, comfort, or love, or you want to take the next step in your faith and come forward to be baptized into Christ, I encourage you this morning to come forward as we stand and sing.

Church History& Church of Christ& Comments& Restoration31 Jul 2007 11:13 pm

Hello everyone:

I finished up “Distant Voices” and I really enjoyed it….so, I picked up another of C. Leonard Allen’s (along with Richard Hughes, this time) books, “Discovering our Roots: The Ancestry of Churches of Christ.”

If you’ve not read this book, pick it up. It provides some really great backgound on Restorationist thought in Christianity that occured before our movement began and which had great influences on our movement.

The best irony I’ve found so far is that alot of our restorationist roots came from the Puritans…who were later known as Congregationalists….who later merged with some other churches and formed the United Church of Christ. Its quite amazing how belief changes over time.

-Clarke

Comments25 Jul 2007 09:34 pm

Hello all:

Our church pre-school finally closed.

The teachers in the pre-school demanded that the church pay their insurance and workers comp. payments up front this year, which total about $6000. Since our church has a hard time even paying our small staff (of interns, who make very little), it was a ridiculous demand… but one that they expected us to meet.

The worship ministry met and prayed over it, and asked God to have his will prevail….and so, on Monday, we were handed the keys to the pre-school by one of the member-teachers who just left the congregation because we couldn’t come up with six grand. This was an interesting moment. Very few of us had ever been inside this part of the building, as it was always kept locked and only the teachers and the pre-school “ministry” (what a misnomer…) leaders had a key.

It was sickening to walk inside. Our Sunday school classrooms are bare…we can’t afford supplies hardly….but the pre-school had everything…. a brand new freezer…the only H-Vac system in the building that works….. school supplies everywhere…toys…

Its amazing that such a small, insignificant pre-school could control an entire congregation for years.

I’m glad its gone. Maybe we can start focusing on doing the work of Jesus, and not on keeping a pre-school running.

-Clarke

Comments16 Jul 2007 09:43 pm

Hello all:

Well, as you are all used to hearing from me, I’ve been busy. My family and I finally moved into our house, and I’ve been working non-stop. Every time I turn around there is a new crime to investigate or a new emergency to respond to. Being the “resident” ranger has its perks…but also its pains.

I’ve been reading a couple of books….right now I’m in the middle of “Distance Voices” by C. Leonard Allen. Most of it is a rehash of things I’ve read elsewhere, but Allen brings a lot of different material together into an interesting looking collection displaying the diversity of our movement.

I’ve had a couple of topics to blog on, but have never had the time, and now they’ve slipped my mind.

We missed church yesterday because I was really sick. I spent several hours at the hospital and several more in the bathroom. It was no fun.

The 3 Sundays before, however, we spent at an independent Christian Church. We went some Sunday nights to our congregation as well, but the situation there is deteriorating more and more…and I think that sooner of later it will close its doors. When we leave the Christian church…we feel much more renewed and in touch with how we are supposed to live a Christ-like life than we do when we are at our church… I don’t know what is going to happen with that. Now that we live 30 miles from our congregation, it might be time to make a change. I guess we’ll see….

How are you all doing? I’ve not been keeping up with the blogs…any major changes in life?

-Clarke

Comments23 May 2007 09:30 pm

Hello all:

I recently wrote a post on the Immorality of Church Finance.

A piece of information I left out in that post was about how the church I am a member of got into the precarious financial situation we are in. In my church finance post, I mention a member that was a large contributor financially, who moved away. That same member bailed the church out of a scheme, in the form on a loan. He is still earning interest each month on his loan to us.

The scheme that he bailed the congregation out of was that of bonds. The church sold bonds to various members of the congregation to raise money. Those members were making significant interest on their investment…in other words, they were making money off of the church… a lot of money.

When the congregation couldn’t afford to repay the interest, or the bonds, a wealthy member stepped forward and purchased all of the bonds. Those members who bought bonds got their money back, with interest, and the church started paying off its debt to this member. All of this occurred several years before we joined the congregation.

I believe this to be immoral. Loaning money on interest to Christians is not a biblical concept.

Unfortunately, I see that we are not the only group that has subscribed to this method of church finance. When I opened up my weekly email from the Christian Standard, I found the following ad (Click to make it full size):

CDF Online ad

Maybe someday we will learn not to do things like this.

I’m sending an email to Christian Standard about this blog post. I challenge them to drop ads from CDF.

-Clarke

Church of Christ& Thoughts21 May 2007 07:50 pm

Hello all:

So how about a manual poll?

What eschatological view do you hold, and why?

Premillenialism

Postmillenialism

Amillenialism

Partial Preterist

Full Preterist

or - Don’t know.

-Clarke

Church History& Comments& Restoration& Unity15 May 2007 05:10 pm

Hello all:

I just finally finished reading The Fool of God by Louis Cochran. I started reading it a long time ago, and I’ve picked it up in spurts every once in a while.

My grandfather bought the book for me while we were visiting Bethany College back in the early 90’s. He bought it on the condition that I read it. It look a long time, but I finally fulfilled that promise.

While the book is written in novel form, its an eye-opening picture into the life and beliefs of Alexander Campbell. If you haven’t read it…give it a try.

-Clarke

Church of Christ08 May 2007 02:15 pm

Hello all:

Change is coming to church, and the internet, very soon.

Keep your eye out for it.

-Clarke

Church History& Comments& Restoration& Scripture21 Apr 2007 06:00 am

Hello all:

Just over a year ago, I wrote a post asking what people though about the apocrypha. Since then, I’ve done a lot more thinking on the subject.

The Apocrypha, or the Deutero-Canonical books as the Catholics call them, was included in the Christian canon until Martin Luther excluded them in 1534. Luther also excluded Esther, Hebrews, James, Jude, and Revelation. Luther stated that he wished Esther had never been written, and he called James “an epistle of straw.”

I am not saying that apocrypha is scripture…and I am not saying that it is not; I am saying, however, that I think we should re-visit the apocrypha, that we should read it, and that we should carefully and prayerfully consider whether or not these writings hold a place as sacred scripture.

Some questions I have:

What gave Luther the right to remove these books from the canon?

The apocrypha was included in the canon for 1500 years. Would God allow these books to be considered scripture for such a long period of time if they did not belong in the canon?

What makes Esther, Hebrews, James, Jude and Revelation acceptable, but the apocryphal books unacceptable?

Shouldn’t we, as a group of churches that values “Restoration,” consider whether or not the apocrypha is in need of restoration in the Protestant church?

-Clarke

Church of Christ& Thoughts19 Apr 2007 11:18 pm

Hello all:

I’ve been pondering church finance as of late. My congregation is having money problems, as I have written before. We just had a member move out of the area, one that was a significant financial contributer.

On Sunday, our minister led the Lord’s Supper and took the collection. There was no Lord’s Supper reflection, which is not the norm for our church…but there was a lengthy reflection on giving…of a type I’ve never heard in a Church of Christ yet. Our minister spoke about how giving money can be equaled by others through their giving of time and energy. He was rebuffing a comment made by another member recently about how our worship ministry should respect the wishes of those who give the most money.

Every time I look at our bills and church finances, I see a trend. Our congregation treats people different based on how much money they give. We seem to “employ” some people who are in need of money and have a certain status, yet we take money from others. A case in point:

We employ two widows, one of whom was an elder’s wife, through our pre-school. None of the students in this pre-school attend our church, so, in essence, we take money from non-believers and give it to church members. The pre-school doesn’t break even… no matter how much a couple of members claim… they generate thousand dollar energy bills which the church ends up subsidizing to provide two “jobs” to two widows. At the same time, we rent our parsonage to another widow, a member of the church….. we take her money, along with rent subsidies that the state provides… the money she gives us in essence bankrolls the pre-school. We take money from one person is deemed “not as worthy” to give to someone else that is deemed “worthy.”

To top it off, we also receive rent from Cingular Wireless, as they have a cell-phone tower on our property. Never mind the immoral acts AT&T is involved in….we take their money and subsidize the pre-school and the church.

Our $2.5 million building is falling apart. I’m not sure if that is a good thing, or a bad thing.

-Clarke

Church History& Comments19 Apr 2007 11:24 am

Hello all:

Who ever thought that you could make a game out of church history and politics? Check this out… Vatican Board Game.

-Clarke

Church History& Church of Christ& Thoughts01 Apr 2007 10:16 pm

Sometimes I reflect on growing up in the church and what we were taught….and then I reflect on what being a Christian is really about.

How did the real meaning of what it means to be a Christian get lost in some Churches of Christ? Campbell and Stone worried much more about being a real Christian than in having every last detail right..so how did it happen? Lipscomb and Harding, the separatists that they were, were very worried about being true Christians….so Sand Creek wasn’t the turning point as far as it all goes….how did it happen?

-Clarke

Comments& Disciples of Christ& Unity24 Mar 2007 05:09 pm

Hello all:

Newell Williams, the president of Brite Divinity School and co-editor of the the Stone-Campbell Encyclopedia, has been appointed as the Moderator of the Christian Church.

As the moderator, Williams will preside over the General Assembly of the Disciples of Christ that will take place in Fort Worth, Texas in July.

This is good news. Newell Williams has a vision of unity for all three streams of the Restoration Movement, and his beliefs about baptism are much more in-line with Churches of Christ and Christian Churches than much of the Disciples. Hopefully he will be a “moderating” force that will steer the Disciples from the extreme liberalism that they have been embracing over the last few years.

-Clarke

College22 M